QARC MEETING FULL
Organizing the Meeting to Review the Evaluation and Determine Eligibility Upon completion of the full and individual evaluation, the ARC Chairperson schedules an ARC Meeting for the purpose of reviewing the evaluation.ĪRC REVIEW OF STUDENT PERFORMANCE INFORMATION Prior to meeting to review the referral information, the ARC Chairperson selects and notifies ARC members for an ARC Meeting (according to ARC Membership in procedures for PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS).Īdditional consent to provide services is not needed, even though the location(s) of the delivery of services may change.Any changes in the special education program of the child after initial placement are subject to prior notice requirements ( ARC Meeting and Conference Summary) but not subject to parental consent.Ī regularly scheduled Executive Board meeting is defined as (a) any meeting announced at the first ARC Meeting of the new school year, and (b) has its own agenda and minutes.ĭate of previous Eligibility ARC Meeting: Date of current Eligibility ARC Meeting: NOTE: 10 or more absences - Attendance Review Committee (ARC) Meeting with the CEO or Director of Operations.9 absences - Student attendance improvement conferences with the site’s administration (Fernhill- Principal or Assistant Principal Awbury- Lower or Middle School Director) to review policy, provide support, and revisit the Truancy Elimination Plan, (TEP).The ARC Chairperson notifies all members (according to Notice of ARC Meetings in procedures for PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS) to attend the ARC Meeting.Ī student with six unexcused absences in a year must be reported as habitually truant.
The ARC will meet next on 7 October 2005.Other Board members and employees may attend the ARC Meeting upon the invitation of the Committee. The role and composition of the roundtable, how it would relate to the existing structure of national organisations, and draft terms of reference. facilitate cross-border consensus-building, thus minimising subsequent enforcement risks for EU issuers.Īfter discussion, the ARC decided to prepare a more detailed paper for the next ARC meeting that would include details on.act as an early warning mechanism for contentious accounting issues and.allow rapid discussion of important accounting issues, thereby minimising the risk of different interpretations of IFRSs across Europe.They considered whether to form a 'roundtable' involving a broad range of stakeholders, including the Commission, IASB/IFRIC, CESR, EFRAG, FEE, the Big Four, national standard setters, and preparers, that could: The ARC discussed the issues of consistent application and enforcement of IFRSs in the EU.In that regard, the IASB chairman said that a final decision on whether to have one or two performance statements has not yet been made. Regarding the joint IASB/FASB performance reporting project, the ARC meeting summary indicates that "some Member States found the proposals for a single statement of comprehensive income unacceptable".Would IASB support a single technical accounting body speaking for Europe rather than the current situation where there are several European bodies.The timetable for convergence and how much change is appropriate in the next few years.How the decision is made as to which standard (IFRSs or US GAAP) is better.Questions asked by ARC Member States related to:
QARC MEETING UPDATE
Max Kley, Trustee of the IASC Foundation, gave an update on the completion of the constitutional review. Sir David Tweedie, Chairman of the IASB, addressed the ARC on the IASB's work on the convergence of international and national accounting standards."The CESR representative stated that it was unlikely that they would be looking at companies' accounting treatment of emission rights." It was noted that IAS 8 provides guidance on what companies should do if a transaction or event is not specifically addressed in IFRSs. The ARC discussed how European companies should account for emission rights in light of the IASB's withdrawal of IFRIC 3.The ARC members voted unanimously to endorse, for use in Europe, the IASB's June 2005 Fair Value Option Amendment to IAS 39 and consequential amendments to IFRS 1 and IAS 32.
0 kommentar(er)
